Jefflinks

Pennsylvania requires people who eBay stuff they don’t own to get a state auctioneer’s license, demonstrating once again that they will be dragged kicking and screaming out of the 19th century.

New media douchebags explained. Extremely funny and surprisingly safe for work, provided reading this sentence out loud is safe where you work.

Thanks to Making Light: Jon’s Singer’s turkey algorithm is, “for a turkey of greater than ten pounds, the roasting time should be equal to 1.65 times the natural log of the weight of the bird in pounds, cooked at 325 F.” I’m amused to see a natural logarithm being used for anything. I also think this is the first time I’ve used the two words I always mistype, logarithm and algorithm, together in a paragraph.

Check out the most viewed articles at Conservapedia. Man, some folks need a hobby.

Jefflinks

Brilliant SNL spoof of iPhone ads.

Now available until November 26: the One Laptop Per Child XO. $400 for US and Canadian residents only, which buys one for you and one for someone else. And you get a year of T-Mobile hotspot service.

If you wrote a novel about Atlantic City politics, it couldn’t be as bizarre as what’s really going on.

As a communications geek, I’m amused by this piece on the disappearing phone booth. First that people’s connections to it are from the Superman movies, when the “changing in a phone booth” trope dates back to the cartoons and comics of the 1930s and 1940s. Second that there are now phone booths without phones. Third that the kid quoted at the end has apparently never had a dead battery.

A friendly reminder from Scrooge

Brian pointed me to the Australian Santa Clauses (Santa Clai?) who can’t say “ho ho ho” for fear of deriding nearby women as harlots.

So let me get this straight: once a year, millions of people take their offspring to see a jolly fat messiah icon whose image was invented by the Coca-Cola company, who then bribes children with presents in order to get them to sit on his lap. The children are encouraged to be extra good in order to curry favor with this man, who then will visit their homes while they’re sleeping.

And the issue is the word “ho”? Seems to me that the goyim are missing the obvious.

Bush, the post-ironic president

Was it just me, or did anyone else burst out laughing when they heard our Commander-in-Chief say the following?

I spoke to President Musharraf right before I came over here to visit with President Sarkozy. And my message was that we believe strongly in elections, and that you ought to have elections soon, and you need to take off your uniform. You can’t be the President and the head of the military at the same time.

So here we have the man who was elected through the result of not one, but two disputed elections, giving advice on democracy to a man who took power through a military coup and is now extending his rule via martial law.

But that’s not why this was funny. This was funny because no president before Bush has been so damned clingy to his role as Commander-in-Chief, using his titular role as head of the military to construe criticism of him as criticism of “the troops”. His presidency is all obout being president and head of the military. He’s the first English-speaking politician to wear a codpiece since Blackadder. And obviously, he had all traces of irony surgically removed at birth.

It’s the small things….

It took me several weeks of staring at this graphic on my screen (taken from iTunes) before I realized quite how amazing it was:

nanored.png

An icon of my iPod — no big deal, right? Except that they got the color right. Which means two things: first, that iTunes is shipping with icons for all iPods it might encounter. That’s nothing special. Second — that Apple took a purely cosmetic feature and coded it into the hardware so the iPod could tell iTunes, “yes, I am indeed a red iPod,” and post the correct graphic.

Tip o’ the hat, Apple.

David Porten, 1932-2007

Many of my blog regulars know that the reason the postings have fallen off of late is because of my father’s recent illness. He died in his sleep early Sunday morning; my heartfelt thanks to the many people who have helped me get through a difficult time.

A brief FAQ for the questions I’ve heard most often this week: yes, I am keeping both my Dad’s apartment and my apartment in Washington, with the expectation of dividing my time between my two homes; I am unsure what I’m going to do with my Dad’s candy store, but I’m inclined to keep it going as soon as I determine how; and yes, I’m doing pretty well this week, but email is always welcome.

Below I’m appending my father’s obituary and my eulogy for him, in part because I feel he deserves a semi-permanent tribute, and this website is about as semi-permanent as anything in my life.

David Porten, 74, a business owner known as the “Candyman” on the Atlantic City Boardwalk, died in his sleep Sunday. A native of Philadelphia, he was well known to many people through his series of stores in Philadelphia, Wrightstown, NJ, and for the past 12 years, Atlantic City, as well as his regular activities in local Jewish communities and chambers of commerce. His lifetime was marked by his unwavering devotion to his mother, Ida; his wife, Lois; and his surviving son Jeffrey. Memorial donations may be made to UPHS, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, 3400 Spruce Street, 5 West Gates, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

Eulogy, October 30 2007, 18 Heshvan 5768

Many of you already know that I’ve been here in Atlantic City for the past few months. Shortly after I got here, I learned something that I hadn’t really known before.

It wasn’t exactly a shocker that it seemed like everyone who has ever set foot on the Boardwalk knew my Dad — even if they called him the Candyman without knowing his real name. But what did surprise me was that, over and over, the people who I met — who only casually knew my father — didn’t merely like him. They actively cared for him. I’m talking about a hundred store regulars whose names I’ve forgotten, the postman, the UPS guy, the guys with the rolling chairs, the cops on bikes, ninety percent of the Tropicana workforce; even the folks I met in the Atlantic City Mercantile department.

Every time, I expected to see, perhaps, polite familiarity with my father. And every time, you could tell by the looks on their faces and the tone of their voices that they weren’t just asking after Dad to be polite to me.

If this is the effect he had on casual acquaintances, is there any wonder about how powerfully he affected the people in this room, the people who loved him? We loved him because he loved us, with unwavering intensity. And despite the constant sarcastic jokes my Mom and I both made about how the little white dogs came first—believe me when I say that we never spent a minute doubting that we were the center of my father’s life. He made that a wonderful place to be.

I had a great friendship with my father, and I once asked him how he had learned to be who he was, and especially how he had learned to be such an excellent father to me. He gave all the credit to his mother and to my mother, and refused to take any of it for himself. Which may come as a surprise to all of us who have trouble putting “humble” and “David Porten” in the same sentence.

But it’s true, and I spent many years telling him repeatedly what I’m about to share with you now, in the hope that when he hears it today he’ll finally, truly accept the honor due to him. So Dubbie:

for persevering through adversity and always, always coming through with that raw confidence you had in yourself;

for the number of times you achieved the impossible, because your self-confidence was so damn well justified;

for being a much better dancer than I’ll ever be;

for epitomizing and showing me what it means to be a true mensch and gentleman;

for being simultaneously the strongest and the most tender man I have ever met;

for all of these reasons, Dubbie, and many more, you are my hero, and you always will be.

You Can’t Go Home Again

6, 1, 5, 2, 3, 4, 7.

For some of us, born between, say, World War II and Y2K, these numbers were memorized in our childhood. I just typed them from memory (unlike most of my posts, which require a trip to Wikipedia for confirmation before I can sound erudite), although it’s been at least 20-odd years since I’ve had reason to reference them.

They came back to me now because I finally made time to watch The Chronicles of Narnia. Those numbers are the internal chronological order of the seven novels, a key thing to learn if you’re ten years old and intend to move your imagination into Narnia full-time for a few years.

(At least, they were the order of the novels, until recent editions of the series reordered the books to make them match the chronology. There are some of us who consider this to be blasphemy on the order of a child being forced to watch The Phantom Menace before being allowed to watch Star Wars. For both Narnia and the Lucasverse, the order of consumption is obvious: first-time readers and viewers should watch them in the order they were created; after that, the next 100 or so repeats can be in any order desired.)

Those of you who have neither read the books nor seen the movie should be spanked and sent to bed without supper. That way, you can’t read this, as this post is nothing but spoilers from here on in.

It was a strange experience watching the movie, in that it’s no exaggeration to say that I read the Narnia books upwards of 40 times as a kid. The thing is, I have an awful memory for fiction—I sometimes have to read a novel most of the way through before I have the slightest idea that I’ve read it before. So even though I memorized the books so thoroughly that I can still picture the cracks I put in their spines, if you had asked me three hours ago what Lion was about, I’d have said, “Um… big lion, some English schoolkids, and there’s something about a candy called Turkish Delight.”

So prior to the movie, I was wondering if I’d get the same sort of childlike glee that came in brief doses during Superman Returns. (Largely due to its soundtrack; the rest of the movie, not so much.) Turns out that I’m not twelve anymore, and the wall is now pretty damn solid in the back of my wardrobe.

Sure, the movie has its merits. It’s beautiful to look at, and even under the thrall of the White Witch, Narnia looks like a more pleasant place to be than Middle-earth. I’d personally nominate the film for the Academy Award in Best (and Damn Near Only) Actors and Screenplay Where The Children Actually Act Like Children. And credit where credit is due to the actors and director, as throughout the first half of the film I wanted to drown Edmund with the same hateful fury I felt towards him twenty-five years ago.

But the thing is, back when I was twelve, I kinda missed that whole Jesus thing. Yeah, I know, it’s a big thing to miss, but hey—I’m Jewish. And there’s something about video allegory that just makes it much more honking obvious than it is in print. Not that Narnia laid it on too thickly, in my book; for that, I’ll refer you to Matrix Revolutions. But there’s still something, well, insidious about feeding subliminal messages to non-Christian children that Jesus is a superhero.

The Guardian said it much better than I can:

[H]ere in Narnia is the perfect Republican, muscular Christianity for America—that warped, distorted neo-fascist strain that thinks might is proof of right. I once heard the famous preacher Norman Vincent Peale in New York expound a sermon that reassured his wealthy congregation that they were made rich by God because they deserved it. The godly will reap earthly reward because God is on the side of the strong. This appears to be CS Lewis’s view, too. In the battle at the end of the film, visually a great epic treat, the child crusaders are crowned kings and queens for no particular reason.

Actually, to me, the crowning scene was mainly notable in that it was so similar to Star Wars I expected to see C3PO and R2D2 in the audience.

That’s really what got me. Four human children (or to put it more accurately, four white Western human children) show up in fantasyland. Humans are a special breed there, everyone else being nonhuman. Actually, since all of the humans are immediately royalty, you can more accurately say that everyone else there is subhuman. One of the humans, who maybe started shaving last year, is made a military leader and outranks what appears to be dozens of field generals and colonels. His next action is to lead an outnumbered and underpowered army into a head-on attack, in a textbook example of what not to do when you’re outnumbered and underpowered. Of course, he wins.

Am I reading too much into this? Possibly. Like I said, I spent much of my childhood in Narnia, and I joined neither Jews for Jesus or the College Republicans. But ever since I read David Brin’s scathing essay on the lessons of Star Wars, I’ve given a lot of thought to cultural myths. It doesn’t take a great leap from the feel-good warm fuzzies of the Narnian war of liberation, to the mindset of Iraqi invasion in 2003—and perhaps to a lesser extent, to the mindset that we don’t torture people because we’re the good guys, so anything we do is presumptively not torturous. The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe is one hell of an allegory for Westerners being greeted with flowers and parades by their intellectual and genetic inferiors; no wonder that it’s such a popular British import.

Read Brin’s essay if you haven’t already. Then, if you feel like it, watch some of your favorite American mythological fiction, and see how you feel.

Fluther: IMing a room of smart people

I’ve been playing around for a few days with fluther.com, which seems to me to be a sort of useful Twitter. Log in and post a question, and Fluther matches the question with people whom its AI has deemed to be experts. Q&As all seem to be short and to the point. I haven’t used it yet for a personal question, but I note that the answers I’ve read all seem to be accurate, and most of the time people beat me to writing the brilliant response I would have had. Might be a very useful site, especially if the userbase hits critical mass and we start seeing Twitterific-style adaptations to make it more integrated into the desktop experience.

A special moment from Kodak

This was originally released on January 1st, so I must have been too hung over too busy to catch it the first time around. Purported to be an internal Kodak promo video that was officially released because it was so damn good. NSFW, in the sense that uncontrollable giggling is generally looked upon askance.

An idea for medical insurance

I’m in a Sicko-inspired debate over on Brian’s ISBS, which led me to the following thought.

It’s been repeatedly established that American health care just ain’t all that and a bag of chips. Meanwhile, medical tourism seems to be thriving—and importantly, provides an interesting free market window into the prospect of how people would manage their medical care if they had the freedom to do so.

As I see it, there are three things that would artificially depress American medical tourism, lower than what might be considered a rational norm:

  1. The widespread and erroneous belief that American medical care is the best in the world; if you think you’ve got the best in the world here (even if it’s being denied to you), why would you look for substandard care elsewhere?
  2. The low percentage of people who leave the US for any reason in their lifetimes. Partially a geographic effect, partially cultural; we are, after all, the physical size of Europe. Almost all of us have been to other states, but most people are taught that it’s silly or expensive to go to other countries. That’s a high psychological bar, especially for sick people.
  3. The internalized and externalized costs of medical care. People are used to paying thousands of dollars for insurance, and then minimizing their out-of-pocket expenses afterwards. A flight to Thailand for surgery is entirely out-of-pocket, even if the entire cost is far cheaper than similar surgery in your neighborhood.

So my question: how about an insurance company that leverages these differences to provide top-notch health care at very low cost? As follows:

  1. The company provides all of the advance research necessary to make you fully-informed about the care you’re getting, and that it’s as good or better as American care. When American care is the best and the most economical, that’s what you get. But you don’t have to do the 1,000 hours of research necessary to engage in medical tourism or shopping around for medications.
  2. Your meds are purchased by the insurer and drop-shipped to you; they get them at the best possible cost. You get what you need with no exclusions and a low deductible.
  3. When you need hospitalization or outpatient treatment, and it’s far too expensive in the US, the company pays complete costs for travel and lodging to ensure that you get the treatment you need, wherever it’s provided. Again, you’re provided with ample documentation to show that you’re getting US-equivalent or better care.

It seems to me that the costs for this company would be far lower than other insurance companies, which translates into lower premiums, wider coverage, and lower (or no) deductibles.

So—why doesn’t this exist?