Wikipedia eats its own dog food

I was aware that there are aspects of Wikipedia and the Wikipedia editing community which might be seen as, well, humorous to outsiders.

It did not occur to me that this would be considered a valid topic in Wikipedia.

An adorable picture of a baby polar bear. Disgustingly adorable, in fact.Cute: is it [neutral point of view] to say the animal to the right has been called “cute”? Opinions vary.

Tiger: A revert war on whether the tiger can properly be described as the “most powerful living cat” (complete with accusations that people were “tiger fanboys”) gradually led to arguments about how tigers would match up vs. bears and crocodiles, complete with another revert war about the inclusion of a YouTube video showing a tiger fighting a crocodile.

Daffy Duck: Did Daffy Duck father any children? Should the events of certain animated films be taken to have occurred in “real life” while others should not?

List of fictional ducks: You read that right; edit warring over nonexistent waterfowl.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *