Mickey, Donald shot — film at 11

Flabbergasting.

Florida’s legislature has approved a bill that would give residents the right to open fire against anyone they perceive as a threat in public, instead of having to try to avoid a conflict as under prevailing law.

Republican Governor Jeb Bush, who has said he plans to sign the bill, says it is “a good, commonsense, anti-crime issue.” The bill, supported by the influential National Rifle Association, was approved by both houses of the Republican-run legislature on Tuesday.

Note the phrase “perceive as a threat”. So basically, blow away anyone you like if you can later claim you thought they were dangerous?

In case you didn’t get your fill last week

Courtesy of the Museum of Hoaxes, the Top 100 April Fool’s Hoaxes of all time. My favorite:

On March 31, 1940 the Franklin Institute issued a press release stating that the world would end the next day. The release was picked up by radio station KYW which broadcast the following message: “Your worst fears that the world will end are confirmed by astronomers of Franklin Institute, Philadelphia. Scientists predict that the world will end at 3 P.M. Eastern Standard Time tomorrow. This is no April Fool joke. Confirmation can be obtained from Wagner Schlesinger, director of the Fels Planetarium of this city.”

Although maybe it would have been nice to live in an era when scientists had this much credibility.

Homeless at Starbucks

Here’s a guy who lives at Starbucks for real. Homeless in NYC. Desktop computer since his laptop was stolen in a shelter. And apparently suffering from an inability to prioritize:

[W]e gave him enough money for a few good meals and bus ticket to Illinois (to meet his next love). Yesterday I popped in to say hello. He excitedly told me about the new flat panel monitor he got for $50, the new keyboard for $10, and the memory stick for his old monitor-less laptop.

According to the commentary, he’s gone now.

Tilted

I’m thrilled these guys are still in business, but man, this makes me want to cry:

A single privately held company with 56 full-time employees and revenue of just over $30 million that puts out three or four new models a year. The entire world’s supply of new coin-operated pinball machines is limited to the roughly 10,000 that roll off the Stern assembly line each year.

How Loews L’Enfant Plaza is truly pissing me off

I’m attending a conference here today, and their network connection fees that they charge the organizers are worthy of Soviet Russia. Charges by the day, by the network drop, by the WiFi connection, and by the connected user to the WiFi connection. And when I say charges, I mean hundreds.

I expect the organizers are dropping over $100K on this meeting; most of the attendees are academics who run their own conferences. What do you suppose are the odds they’re going to come back here?

When I asked for a place where I could grab a cigarette, I was directed to the outdoor plaza surrounding the building, where high winds made it impossible to make a phone call. Or, for that matter, wear my hat.

Important notice to Loews L’Enfant: in many hotels, closed-off locations with separate ventilation are provided to their patrons where they may have a cigarette. Such places are called “bars”. In these “bars”, many people are inclined to purchase “alcoholic beverages” which, I understand, can be sold at a nice profit.

Charmingly, once outside on the plaza, I found myself under attack. On a 63 °F day, half-dollar sized chunks of ice came raining down; given the speed, I’m assuming this was from a very poorly situated condenser off the Loews roof. One exploded off the lid of my PowerBook; had the PowerBook been open (as it was shortly going to be), that could have been a $1,000 screen repair.

The doors to the plaza? One way. Should you decide to actually attend the conference, you walk around the building to the front, or scratch at an entrance until someone lets you in.

The Starbucks kiosk in the lobby closes at 3 PM. Philistines.

I was going to mention the one bright spot here, which is the tasty food at the reception. But then the power blew out, and now it’s not bright anymore.

Brilliant planning. I’ve been here for four hours, and I’m already resolved to never do business with this company again.

Flatlining

Recent events are reminding me of the week my mother died.

It was a remarkable experience, and yet ordinary and routinized. Like many end-of-life stories, Mom got sick, then she got better, then she got very sick. But we still expected that the end of this story would be us bringing her home.

On Wednesday, late at night, I got a phone call from the hospital. Mom had taken a very serious turn for the worse. Her doctor thought that the best course of action was to put her on temporary life support. I set aside the immediate desire to respond “whatever it takes” and said, “My mother does not want to be kept alive on a machine. Is that what we’re talking about?” The doctor said no, sometimes people can have a full recovery if we relieve their bodies of the stress for a day or two.

This struck me as a fine idea, and I gave him permission. On Thursday, I was treated to the bizarre experience of standing by my mother’s bedside and watching her flatline on the monitor. I supposed that since she had once had the same experience with me, there was a sort of poetic karma to this.

By Friday, it was becoming clear that my mother’s will to live, strong as it was, was being overcome by her diabetes. Too much of the rest of her had failed, and the doctor told me that even if she did recover her vital functions, she would have to spend the rest of her life connected to large machines, in a hospital bed.

It was then that I realized that my mother’s death was perhaps not the worst possible outcome of that week. My mother, if dead, couldn’t look at me from the bed where I had consigned her to a life sentence and tell me I had made the wrong choice.

Perhaps, on some level, she knew that. My rational self says this is impossible, but too much of what I experienced then and now has nothing to do with rationality. However it came to pass, on Saturday we got another call from the hospital. We all needed to be there. Right now.

My family went to a room set aside for the purpose of hoping or mourning, and I spoke to the doctors. They said simply, “it’s time.” I asked my family if anyone wanted any last words with her, and then it fell to me. I asked the doctors a few questions to which I already knew the answers, and then agreed.

They then started telling me about the natural autonomous reactions of a dying human body, that my mother would physically go through the motions of suffering, but they were sure she was already gone. I interrupted them and said I knew about such things.

That was the first moment when I saw something new in her doctors. It was surprise.

They had been through this hundreds of times. To this day I think of them as the human embodiment of compassion because even with the repetition, it was so damn clear that they cared about my mother, about my family, and about me. But though the caring words were meant, it was also clear that they had been rehearsed. Likewise, I as the family member had my own script to follow, one dictated by culture, by faith, by emotion. But in my case, also by science.

I’ll never forget the two-beat pause when I said, “yes, I am aware of that.” I think they expected me to be silent, or numbly acquiescent. I am sure they were prepared for a violent, irrational outburst, or a complete emotional breakdown. But they weren’t prepared for me, and I think it is because they had never heard anyone say that before. I don’t know why I knew that. I just did.

After another ten minutes that will stay with me for the rest of my life, during which my mother did not suffer, it was over.

I would like to say, to anyone who is perhaps unclear on the concept, that those four days were not celebrating a culture of life. The culture of life was every moment my mother spent with the people who loved her. Those four days were a culture of living death, a purgatory for my mother and those same people. The only culture of life to be found in the hospital was in the hands of her amazing doctors, who moved Heaven and Earth to try to send my mother back to her life. When they had done all they could do, all that was left was suffering.

In this purgatory, every moment carries significance. Is this the minute when you will make a decision that will forever stare back at you from the mirror? Is that the minute when you will say or do something that will inflict immeasurable harm on your family and loved ones? It is literally inhuman to live through — humanity, lacking omniscience, is not designed for such times.

There has been some national debate recently about morality and terminology. I generally decline to make sweeping universal statements on such matters. Here I will make an exception. Anything that prolongs such misery beyond what is medically necessary is unadulterated evil. Anything that introduces the seed of doubt into the minds and hearts of those who must make such decisions is satanic. Anyone who offers false hope to the loved ones suffering through this — for them, I literally wish that they will burn in Hell.

I do not understand how anyone could live through this themselves, and forget what it feels like. I do not understand how anyone calling himself “doctor” can forget the teachings and ethics of his profession and be an oracle of false hope. I would have thought such to be beyond human capability.

What I learned the week of my mother’s death is how precious our grip on rationality can be, how far you can be willing to go to hold on to illusory hope. In my case, somehow I had learned enough medical information to do the best I could for my mother, to never doubt my decisions, and to retain my sanity and soul in the process. Had I known a little less, had I been more receptive to those who offered their nostrums, or had my mother been subjected to a legal process that took control out my hands, I would have been in danger of losing both.

We all must endure end-of-life stories, first for some of our loved ones, and then our own. I wish everyone could have what I did. Caring doctors who told me the truth, and who trusted me to decide what my mother wanted. An unspoken understanding in my family that I was the best person to take on this burden, without rancor, bitterness, or disagreement. And above all, my mother, whose personality remains so vivid that when she was flatlining and her story transcended the instructions she gave me, I could simply ask her and feel I knew the right answer.

On some days, for some questions, I still can.

Syndicated privacy monitoring

Brilliant idea of the day goes to Jonathan Rentzsch:

How come I can’t get an RSS feed for my credit report? If everyone was monitoring their credit report daily, perhaps identify theft damage could be reduced.

More to the point, perhaps the tens of thousands of errors that are routine introduced to such documents could be reduced. And let’s add to that feed a master list of anyone else who’s reading it, shall we? Can anyone think of a legitimate reason why we should not have access to our own data tracks?

Waco tactics look good to me

Excellent political analysis at the Whiskey Bar:

TED KOPPEL: Good evening, I’m Ted Koppel and this is Nightline. We take you now to ABC News reporter Karen Ryan outside the presidential compound in Waco, Texas, where cult leader Tom DeLay and his “Ranch Davidians” have been holding the Republican Party hostage for almost three months now. What’s the situation there, Karen?

(Cut to stand up shot of Karen Ryan and a tired looking David Duchovny in an FBI windbreaker)

RYAN: It’s been another long, tense day here, Ted, as federal authorities continue to negotiate with the House Majority Leader. I have Special Agent Fox Mulder of the FBI here with me. He’s been on the phone with Mr. DeLay for most of the day. Agent Mulder?

MULDER: It’s a tough situation, Karen. We know DeLay and his followers are heavily armed, and they have enough food and water and campaign contributions stockpiled in there to hold out almost indefinitely. Plus, we still don’t know if the President is one of the hostages or one of the cult members. We hear a lot of rumors, but at this point we haven’t gotten any hard information from the White House on where he stands in this thing.

Mail.app Rule UI Flame War

Sometimes I mix it up on some odd topics. Here’s a little debate I’m in over whether the UI for Mail.app is broken.

What I find highly amusing about this discussion is the presumption by most of my adversaries that I have nothing critical to say about Apple, which is near-ludicrous. Highlights — or at least, my pearls of wisdom — follow. Hit the link to see the whole thing.


No, that’s not broken. The rule setting in Mail.app is a panel; panels are not windows and do not take scrollbars, according to standard Apple UI. The only part that can be called broken here is that presumably the + button should be grayed out when the height of the panel is greater than (height of monitor – height of additional rule entry – height of menu bar). Although arguably, even then you might want to leave it ungrayed unless you had a secondary test for a larger alternate monitor attached.

Might I suggest that the design of Mail.app strongly encourages you to have many rules with one entry per rule, rather than one master rule with many entries. Try it, and you’ll note many design touches which show that this is what the designers had in mind, with positive feedback for users who do so.

Posted by: Jeff Porten at March 26, 2005 03:06 AM

You have no idea how many times we have to hear nonsense such as this. This is what keeps us usabilitites in business – fighting off people who think that software doesn’t need to be modified to serve users’ interests.

God help the people needing usability design who hire you, then. There is nothing sacrosanct about the use of the panel — however, there is something collectively sacrosanct about not changing the behavior of a UI element in one location to make it act differently than it does in 25 or 30 others. As I stated in my original post, the error here is NOT in reworking the panel to provide for an infinite scrolling list; the error is that the user should be limited to the number of rules that can fit in the panel. If you want to provide an infinitely long list, then you need to abandon the panel interface.

Yeah, this _IS_ broken. Any UI designer, including the UI gods at Apple would say that making the USER change how THEY work to suit your app is bad. By this logic, we shouldn’t bother with preemptive multitasking, because it could just as easily be solved by the user not running more than one app at a time.

I’ll skip the ludicrous hyperbole and stick to the ludicrous first two sentences. What amazes me are clueless comments like this one, which seem to imply that humans have some genetic instinct for email rules, akin to the infant sucking reflex. The way a user works is defined by experience, which in turn is developed through repetition across many applications. Therefore, if every panel in every application has a defined and limited set of parameters, you don’t suddenly redefine how that element works because one edge case might decide to create a rule of infinite complexity.

As noted before, fans of infinite complexity can create infinite rules. Or they can choose Perform AppleScript and get infinitely complex there. Such design decisions allow for an application that remains usable by Ma and Pa Kent, who just want to read email from Clark without being sold Kryptonian Viagra.

I again agree with the sentiment that if the UI can ever leave any interactive element completely unaccessible, it’s broken.

What part of “the + button should be grayed out” don’t you understand? Perhaps I should repeat myself using smaller words: yes, it’s bad that you can lose access to widgets. The height of the panel is limited to the height of the monitor. Scroll bars can be added, but break what the user expects from a panel. Therefore, stop the user from adding more than N elements.

An exception is made here for the file dialog panel, which looks like the file dialog in any other part of the system — and has scroll bars. Why? Because you give the user what he expects, and the file dialog is standardized across applications. No such exception exists for the mail rule, which is located in only one application.

Bzzt – wrong answer. Goodness, I sure hope you are not a usability specialist or a programmer who is allowed near the UI. It’s broken.

Both, actually. You don’t have to hire me. Just as I wouldn’t hire you for any work requiring any kind of cogency or ability to present an argument. Should I ever find a need for godlike pronouncements from anonymous people with no credentials, though, I’ll be sure to give you a call.

Republicans hate us for our freedom

This about sums it up:

I have also noticed that two values that BushCo likes to fling around are “life” and “freedom”, but I have also noticed that the two are opposite values in their rhetoric. You can have freedom or life, but not both. They are pretty consistent in this viewpoint, and if they evoke freedom, you can be sure they are covering up for someone’s death, and if they evoke “life”, you can be sure they are trying to take away your freedoms.

Link via Respectful of Otters.

Urban Mapping’s Lenticular NYC

This is simply brilliant:

Each Manhattan tourist map contains 100 plastic coated lenses per inch. Under each tiny lens lie three separate images containing geographic data. These data layers are sliced and stacked on top of one another making each slice just 1/300th of an inch wide. That’s small enough for the Dynamap to play subtle tricks on a viewer’s eye. The viewer thinks she sees multiple layers of information, almost like a hologram. Hold the map at one angle and New York’s subway system emerges. Hold it at another and the city’s neighborhoods appear. Hold it at a third angle and see the city’s street grid.

I’ll be in line to get one of the DC maps when they come out. Twelve years here, and I’m still confused by the taxi zone system.

Treehuggers, evil. Neo-Nazis, not so much.

From Justin Rood, reporter for Congressional Quarterly:

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not list right-wing domestic terrorists and terrorist groups on a document that appears to be an internal list of threats to the nation’s security.

[It includes] left-wing domestic groups, such as the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), as terrorist threats, but it does not mention anti-government groups, white supremacists and other radical right-wing movements, which have staged numerous terrorist attacks that have killed scores of Americans. Recent attacks on cars, businesses and property in Virginia, Oregon and California have been attributed to ELF.

Turns out, we shoot at hostage rescues for the hell of it

On the one hand, I’ve only seen this reported on one site, so I don’t know how credible this is. On the other hand, the other side of the story came from the same people who told us about Jessica Lynch.

“Giuliana [Sgrena] is quite a bit sicker than we have been led to believe,” says Klein. “She was fired on by a gun at the top of a tank, which means that the artillery was very, very large. It was a four-inch bullet that entered her body and broke apart. And it didn’t just injure her shoulder, it punctured her lung. Her lung continues to fill with fluid and there continues to be complications stemming from that fairly serious injury.”

According to Klein, when Calipari was killed and Sgrena wounded, they were on a secured road that can only be accessed through the heavily-fortified Green Zone and is reserved exclusively for top foreign embassy and US officials.

Klein says that Sgrena is very frustrated by the US government’s claim, repeated consistently by the media, that the Italians were fired at from a checkpoint. “She says it wasn’t a checkpoint at all,” Klein says. “It was simply a tank parked on the side of the road that opened fire on them. There was no process of trying to stop the car, she said, or any signals. From her perspective, it was just opening fire by a tank.”

No one could have possibly seen this coming

Children ‘starving’ in new Iraq, BBC News March 30, 2005:

Increasing numbers of children in Iraq do not have enough food to eat and more than a quarter are chronically undernourished, a UN report says. Malnutrition rates in children under five have almost doubled since the US-led intervention — to nearly 8% by the end of last year, it says.

The Six Myths of Gulf War II, Jeff Porten March 21, 2003:

The collapse of the Iraqi government is going to mean the collapse of the Iraqi food distribution system, which the United Nations has called one of the best in the world; Saddam has discovered that feeding people keeps them firmly under his control. The US military doesn’t have the ability to feed 24 million people, and current US postwar plans are to entirely shut out the UN programs with the most experience doing this, in favor of American companies who have landed juicy rebuilding contracts.