Jeff’s Guide to the Mobile Provider Forest

In early 1997, I signed up for an AT&T Wireless plan that offered unlimited minutes, roaming, and long distance — a rare combination at the time, and it cost an arm and a leg. But it was worth it because it allowed me to shut down my Bell Atlantic landline, a day of freedom that ranks up there with Passover in terms of raw liberative power.

So I might be accused of having a bit of a bias against Verizon, based solely on eleven years of bad experiences as one of their customers. The thing is, cell phone companies are like airlines: everyone has their own “avoid at all costs” businesses, and everyone’s is different. Since I’m asked this question frequently in relation to cell phones, I thought I’d share my thoughts.

Verizon Wireless is a separate division in Verizon, and scuttlebutt is that they have their acts together much more than the mothership. This has certainly been true when I’ve had to deal with them for clients; their tech people are knowledgeable and helpful, and don’t seem at all like the types who were unable to install a DSL line six years after the marketing guys started selling them.

The problem is that Verizon is still managed by the same idiots. I’m looking right now at an article from April describing one way in which Verizon continues their “screw the customer” mantra. The phones they sell are routinely crippled — i.e., you couldn’t use it to get files off your computer as the manufacturer designed, so Verizon could sell you ringtones for $1.99. The terms of service for EVDO basically disallow using it for anything that you might want broadband for. No streaming media, no network servers, and God forbid you should share your connection.

The techies at Verizon have told me, sotto voce, that they’re not monitoring for these uses — so if you don’t mind being out of license you can do what you please. But if you rely on it for anything important, it’s awfully disturbing to know you can be shut down at any time.

I was a very happy customer of AT&T Wireless Cingular AT&T (Wireless?) for many years; call them 60% clueful but frequently able to unleash a bis-meshugah clause on their customers. Two years ago, when I ended my relationship with them, it was their policy of charging $300 a month for an unlimited GPRS data plan, when T-Mobile down the block was charging $20. I also own an AT&T branded GSM phone, which I paid full boat for, which they refused to unlock. It’s now my Bluetooth remote control.

Until recently, I was completely gung-ho about T-Mobile, and I still am… mostly. Hands down, they have the best price/performance plan for unlimited Internet: $30/month for GPRS or EDGE and T-Mobile hotspots. On the East Coast, you can’t spit without interfering with a T-Mobile wifi signal, so it’s not hard to get to a connection which blows the doors off EVDO — which in turn is much faster than EDGE. But EDGE is good enough for most of my purposes, which means it is more than likely good enough for yours.

Unfortunately, T-Mobile has recently made their call center a hell on Earth; if I need to make a call about a Mac and a data service, I’m guaranteed to need to tell five different people that I need to talk to “Tier 3 Data Services” before I actually, maybe, get someone who can help me. I spent 90 minutes on hold trying to troubleshoot a client’s Samsung last week, and I still don’t have an answer. I’m not sure why T-Mobile thinks it’s saving money by forcing four people to waste their time with me in between making me listen to their hold music.

I can’t say anything much about Sprint; I wasn’t too impressed with their ability to help me with a Treo 600 (they had the bad computer industry habit of referring me to Palm, who referred me back to Sprint), but I haven’t dealt with them enough to have a strong opinion one way or the other. That being said, if I find myself in the market for EVDO, I’ll be checking them out so I can continue avoiding Verizon like the plague.

3 thoughts on “Jeff’s Guide to the Mobile Provider Forest

  1. I’m no telecom guru, but I’ll add a few (hopefully useful) thoughts here:

    1) For what it’s worth, Verizon Wireless isn’t a division of Verizon Communications. It’s a separate company – a joint-venture between Verizon Communications and Vodafone (see: http://aboutus.vzw.com/aboutusoverview.html). I’m not sure it matters, other than the fact that they will blame each other for problems, just like Spring & Palm do.

    2) My most recent experience with VZW tech support has been less fruitful than you describe (ironically, the topic was exactly installing a DSL line). See the writeup here. (SIDE NOTE: In the last two months, I’ve had two separate e-mails from DSL customers echoing similar problems, so I don’t think it’s necessarily gotten better. Your mileage, of course, may vary).

    3) A quick word about call centers, on which I have some “inside baseball” experience as part of the strategy group for Accenture’s CRM Service Line back in the early 2000’s: Lots of people who call claim they know what the problem is and just need the “answer.” Very few of them (you included, I’m sure) are correct in their self-assessment. So the five different people you have to talk to actually do save money, in that they are of increasing cost to the company, and 90% of the calls never get past the first (i.e., cheapest) one.

    The good CRM systems will flag you as having reached Tier 3 in the past, and send you right there again (kind of like earning your “geek badge” in their systems). Clearly, T-Mobile hasn’t figured this out yet. Then again, phone companies have the hardest time with this kind of data collection, since the unique ID for a caller is often their phone number, and customers who call their phone company for support are often calling from a phone other than their own. If that’s what you’re doing, consider being more consistent. This shouldn’t be your problem, but you may be in the best position to fix it.

  2. You were talking to Verizon Wireless about a DSL line? I think I can see the source of your problem….

    Actually, what ticks me off in a big way about the whole “let’s track the customer by the phone he’s calling from” is that they tell you, “don’t call us from your cell phone.” Yo, schmucks, my only phone is my cell phone. I expect that this problem will be solved in the future by calling with Skype, and God help them when they try to track that — all Skype calls provide the same nonsense number on caller ID.

    Yes, it would be nice if T-Mobile handed out geek badges. It would be even nicer if there were any Mac problems that didn’t require Tier 3 support, but in my experience, if it involves a Mac, that’s who I need to talk to.

  3. You were talking to Verizon Wireless about a DSL line? I think I can see the source of your problem…

    Interesting. You’re absolutely right. It wasn’t Verizon Wireless, it was Verizon Online which, as far as I can tell, is a division of Verizon Communications. So I wonder why the tech support guy I spoke to back then told me they were separate. Maybe the two divisions are so distinct that they function as two separate companies? Maybe the tech support guy was just being lazy? No way of knowing at this point…

    Re: cell phones – there’s no reason a CTI (Computer-Telephone Integration) system couldn’t identify your cell phone from Caller ID and pop up your account for the rep. It is a little ironic that you’re looking at Skype to protect your phone records, and yet the functionality you’re complaining about coudl be improved by providing that information to the right people…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *